Grid-Connected Mining is Bitcoin mining within an electrical system connected to the public grid. The grid may supply all the electricity or supplement local generation and batteries. The name describes the connection; it does not tell us the tariff, whether the requested load is permitted, or whether the operation is profitable.
Our hall might have rooftop panels. On a sunny afternoon it covers much of its own consumption, then buys more grid electricity in the evening. It remains connected rather than becoming Off-Grid Mining, which relies on a stand-alone supply. Similarly, Behind-the-Meter Mining places the mining equipment on the local side of a meter; it does not necessarily mean independence from the grid. The Australian government guide distinguishes connected and stand-alone systems by their configuration. A moment when the meter shows no imports does not, by itself, mean the connection is no longer needed. [1]
A large mining operation cannot skip the stages between applying for a connection and starting up. The network operator must assess the impact of the new load and set connection conditions. ERCOT, which operates the grid serving much of Texas, provides a specific example. For new large loads covered by its approval process, it requires permission before electricity is first supplied to them. Completing the studies alone is therefore not enough to start. This is a local process, not a worldwide rule. When a project announces capacity, we need to know whether it has merely applied, completed studies, obtained approval, or actually started using that capacity. [2] [6]
The meter totals energy consumed in kilowatt-hours, kWh. The bill may also charge for maximum demand in kilowatts, kW, plus fixed monthly items. A kilowatt measures the power we need; a kilowatt-hour measures the energy consumed over time. The symbol h used in the example stands for hours. U.S. DOE, the US Department of Energy, separates these components when comparing tariffs. For our hall, an attractive energy-only price may therefore be far from the final cost of operation. The calculation must include the applicable supply and distribution charges as well. [3]
Consider our own simplified example with no other loads: one installation draws 100 kW for 10 h, another 200 kW for 5 h. Both consume 1000 kWh. Yet the second needs twice as much power while running. If the tariff also charges for maximum demand, the bills may differ despite identical energy totals. The particular rate and measurement interval matter: billed demand need not be the highest instantaneous reading. This calculation separates energy from power; on its own, it determines neither the bill nor the mining revenue. [3]
An operator moves mining to the night and expects savings. With a suitable tariff, the energy component may indeed fall. But a charge for the site’s own maximum demand may cover the whole month regardless of time of day; another component may reflect demand during the grid’s peak hours. U.S. DOE also describes tariffs that carry the effect of an earlier peak into later months. One brief period of high demand can therefore have lasting financial consequences. We compare the consumption profile with the actual tariff rather than relying on a daily average. [3]
When electricity becomes expensive, a farm may reduce mining because continued operation no longer pays. That alone does not mean anyone will pay it to switch off. Demand Response refers to programs in which customers reduce consumption, or commit to doing so, under agreed conditions and may receive compensation. U.S. DOE distinguishes this from simply responding to changing prices. Our calculation therefore keeps avoided electricity purchases, lost mining revenue and compensation actually earned as separate items. A service nobody contracted for is not another income stream. [4]
The hall goes dark despite panels on the roof and a battery by the wall. Those devices need not be faulty: many grid-connected solar systems stop supplying the property during a grid outage, and not every battery is configured as backup. The Australian guide makes this distinction explicit. Outage operation requires an appropriate design, safe separation from the grid and enough supply for the selected circuits. Uptime—the share of the observed period spent operating—cannot therefore be inferred simply from the fact that a company owns a battery. [1]
A system designed to operate independently for a time is often called a microgrid: a local electrical network with its own controls. U.S. DOE explains why generation and consumption must remain balanced during separation and restoration. Power returning does not necessarily mean every mining machine immediately resumes work. To assess the farm, we track outages, planned reductions and recovery, but also the hashrate actually delivered: the computing power put to use in mining. Only the full costs and revenues complete the picture. A grid connection supports an operation; it does not guarantee a profit. [5]
For the clearest picture, read this entry together with Off-Grid Mining, Behind-the-Meter Mining, Demand Response Mining, Uptime. The reverse links also lead from Power Purchase Agreement.