Gabriela Hájková

Hájková studied economics at Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, known as UJEP, earning the Czech Ing. degree at master’s level. Her profile describes journalism as her first job after university. At Měšec.cz she covers issues that reach directly into household budgets: taxes, pension changes and new legislation. Bitcoin adds another set of questions about money. For a beginner, that is a useful place to start: with something they want to understand in their own life, then with the technical details needed to explain it. [1]

In Bitcoin a blondýna she works with Tomáš Krause, who focuses on using and explaining Bitcoin. Internet Info’s announcement of 4 February 2025 said the programme was entering its second year after its first 16 episodes. That is a milestone in its history, not the current episode count. Conversation gives the subject room to develop: an initial idea of digital money can lead to questions about obtaining it, holding it and actually using it. Listeners need not learn programming before joining that discussion. [2]

The topics listed in the 2025 announcement trace a path from buying bitcoin to choosing a wallet, making payments and accepting them in a business. They also cover scams, mining and passing funds on after death. Imagine someone who has bought a small amount: price is no longer the only question. Who enables them to spend it, and how could their heirs gain access? A wallet manages access and payments; it is not a box containing digital coins. The programme’s topics address such situations. Specific procedures still belong to the service and period discussed in each interview. [2]

On 14 January 2026, Hájková introduced episode 25 with Ivo Krátký, a co-author of Zmizení Satoshi Nakamota. Satoshi Nakamoto is the name used by Bitcoin’s creator, whose real identity has not been reliably established. Krátký described the book authors’ belief that they had come closer to resolving the mystery. He also said the book was not a factual biography. Both points matter together: a compelling story and a guest’s confidence do not establish an identity. Here Hájková presents a guest and his account, rather than a verified unmasking of Satoshi. [3]

Hájková also hosts S Měšcem v plusu, a separate programme covering subjects such as insurance, pensions, housing and employment. This gives a fuller picture of her work: Bitcoin is one area she writes and speaks about, not her entire professional focus. Keep the two programme names separate when looking for more interviews. The S Měšcem v plusu archive also includes a contribution under Dalibor Z. Chvátal’s name. A shared editorial brand does not mean every article or episode was created by the same person. [1] [4]

The Bitcoin a blondýna landing page includes a Trezor competition featuring Trezor One and Trezor T devices. Trezor is a hardware wallet: a separate device that, when used correctly, helps protect the keys needed to authorise payments. The competition promotes the programme; it is separate from explaining how Bitcoin works. If you encounter an older page later, a form or a listed prize does not by itself mean entries remain open. The applicable rules and deadline decide that. A device’s inclusion as a prize also does not replace an assessment of its features and safe use. [5]

The article accompanying the January 2026 episode links to Spotify, Apple Podcasts and YouTube. It also describes voluntary support through Fountain and Lightning Network, a payment network built on Bitcoin that can handle fast, small payments. A listener can simply follow the programme or choose to send the creators small amounts. Those are separate decisions. A payment feature in one app does not mean every other platform works the same way, and mentioning support does not itself introduce a listening fee. [3]

The same article shows how several contributors can appear on a single page. Gabriela Hájková has the article byline, Ivo Krátký is quoted within it, and the illustration is separately credited to Měšec.cz using ChatGPT. Each credit belongs to a different part. The image credit does not tell us how the entire article was produced, and a guest’s quotation is not automatically the author’s opinion. When taking a claim from an interview or sharing it, keeping these roles separate helps preserve who actually said what. [3]