EDITORIAL METHOD
Working with evidence, the Czech source, translations and corrections. What a review date means and where certainty ends.
We tie protocol claims to a specific rule, code version or reproducible procedure. A BIP’s existence alone does not establish deployment or agreement across the network. Calculations state their assumptions and the limits of the result.
Code helps verify software behavior; a dated document helps establish a historical event. A company statement establishes what it claims, not automatically that it is true. Secondary sources add context and independent checks.
We distinguish rules, measured data, historical records and opinions. A number without a unit, date or conditions can mislead. We do not present a market scenario as a certain outcome.
We label estimates, incomplete records and disputed claims. When sources disagree, we explain the difference and the limits of the conclusion. Confident wording does not replace missing evidence.
A material correction should change the erroneous content and its review date in every affected language. A stable address is no reason to retain an error. Educational explanations do not replace individual investment advice.
This methodology describes an editorial standard. We are gradually bringing older parts of the site into line with it. A page’s availability or review date alone does not guarantee completeness or freedom from errors; the date concerns that content, not the entire site or the currency of an external source.
When reporting an error, include the page address, language, exact problematic passage and a verifiable source or procedure. Send your report to meridian2140@proton.me.